Having multiple cores allows a computer to run threads simultaneously. While testing a single core is great for measuring raw speed, many newer computers (including SBCs) are created with multi-core processors. Phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1507085-BE-SFEEDISON70 CPU (Multi-core) PRO TIP: If you choose to upload the results to, you can use the unique ID string to run a comparison on another machine with the same test parameters. Additionally, we can choose to leave out tests that require a graphical user interface (GUI) for modules like the Edison. These tests are more broad than in-depth. As a result, we don't have to be very accurate, but we would like to try and be as precise as possible so we can compare relative performance. ![]() The intent of these tests is to give you an idea of the relative performance among several SBCs. We will also try to list which versions of the operating system (OS) and benchmarking tool we used so you can have an idea of where things might differ. We want to test the out-of-box performance of several SBCs, and as such, we try to keep all software as default as possible (vanilla install from the manufacturer's site or pre-installed on the SBC). X11 libraries), compiler options used, and even the version of benchmarking tool used. Additionally, several factors might influence how the benchmark performs, such as specific versions of libraries (e.g. Note that benchmarking tools generally do not accurately represent how a user might interact with the computer and instead test only one or two aspects of the computer. As a result, we put together a suite of tests that cover a breadth of characteristics of the various SBCs. SBC users have myriad uses for their tiny computers, so subjecting them to just one benchmark, such as graphics, would be remiss of us to not take power, CPU, RAM, etc. ![]() A single board computer (SBC) may not have the same computing power as a modern gaming desktop, but it can still be quite useful and powerful in the right situation. PC gaming fans, in particular, favor 3D graphics benchmarks, such as 3DMark to test their computer's gaming prowess. Good luck with the new components, and don't set anything on fire.Many computer enthusiasts use a wide array of benchmarking tools to push their computers to the limits and compare the results. If one score is way off from the others, something interfered with the test, so try again until you have a consistent set of results.Īnd there you are! If you're making significant upgrades, you should see a clear difference in benchmark results. You won't necessarily get the exact same results each time, but they should be very close. If you want to be scientific about it, reboot again and go back through the whole process from there-just make sure the environment is the same for every test. Run the benchmark, and don't touch anything while it's going. Futuremark recommends waiting another 15 minutes at this point for pristine results, but I wouldn't worry about that in your case. ![]() Next, turn off anti-virus software, close anything that automatically updates, and, well, basically just kill any background software you can safely kill. Before each benchmark, reboot your PC and give it some time to settle. ![]() Start by making sure your OS and drivers are up-to-date. You should follow some best practices, though. Again, if you just want to see the results of an upgrade, there's no need to go overboard. One processor might be great in Tomb Raider, for instance, but struggle in another game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |